Difference between revisions of "Talk:Allegiance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DorianGray (talk | contribs) (Rulers and Knights) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord.'' - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ''Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord.'' - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | : No, this is specifically knights sworn to the king and receiving their tax share from the realm taxes. Same will be possible for dukes. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 17:23, 9 January 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:23, 9 January 2007
I'm curious as to how this will differ from the oaths system... -Chénier 05:10, 8 January 2007 (CET)
Rulers and Knights
Likewise, a knight may own allegiance only to the crown, and not to a duke or lord. - does this mean that rulers could get the option to have their own knights under them, or is this still the Imperial Knight category? DorianGray 13:50, 9 January 2007 (CET)
- No, this is specifically knights sworn to the king and receiving their tax share from the realm taxes. Same will be possible for dukes. --Tom 17:23, 9 January 2007 (CET)
