Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aetheris Pyrism"
(Created page with "<i>Advoco Caelum. Opsecro Caeles:</i> what does this mean? I can't find it anywhere in the pages. -- ~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<i>Advoco Caelum. Opsecro Caeles:</i> what does this mean? I can't find it anywhere in the pages. -- [[User:Shenron|Shenron]] 12:18, 28 September 2011 (CEST) | <i>Advoco Caelum. Opsecro Caeles:</i> what does this mean? I can't find it anywhere in the pages. -- [[User:Shenron|Shenron]] 12:18, 28 September 2011 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Advoco, Caelum, Opsecro, and Caeles are individual Latin concepts I've meshed together possibly making what someone literate in Latin would consider a heresy, to pass an ethic duality concept. Here go the translations: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Advoco: call, summon, invite, convoke, call for; call in as counsel; invoke the Gods | ||
| + | Caelum: heaven, sky, heavens; space; air, climate, weather; universe, world; God | ||
| + | Opsecro: entreat/beseech/implore/pray; (w/deity as object); [fidem ~ => beg support] | ||
| + | Caeles: the_Gods (usu. pl.); divinity, dweller in heaven; saint (Ecc) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In light of this, Advoco Caelum would roughly translate as calling for the higher power from above in a certain respectful but otherwise neutral stance, while Opsecro Caeles would go for very humbly praying to the Gods in a much more submissive posture. The idea would be to describe two ethically correct paths towards spiritual enlightenment, one representing the ideal of a paladin and the other of a monk, so to speak. One more aggressive, of labor, and the other one more passive, of contemplation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comments? | ||
Revision as of 09:21, 5 November 2011
Advoco Caelum. Opsecro Caeles: what does this mean? I can't find it anywhere in the pages. -- Shenron 12:18, 28 September 2011 (CEST)
Advoco, Caelum, Opsecro, and Caeles are individual Latin concepts I've meshed together possibly making what someone literate in Latin would consider a heresy, to pass an ethic duality concept. Here go the translations:
Advoco: call, summon, invite, convoke, call for; call in as counsel; invoke the Gods Caelum: heaven, sky, heavens; space; air, climate, weather; universe, world; God Opsecro: entreat/beseech/implore/pray; (w/deity as object); [fidem ~ => beg support] Caeles: the_Gods (usu. pl.); divinity, dweller in heaven; saint (Ecc)
In light of this, Advoco Caelum would roughly translate as calling for the higher power from above in a certain respectful but otherwise neutral stance, while Opsecro Caeles would go for very humbly praying to the Gods in a much more submissive posture. The idea would be to describe two ethically correct paths towards spiritual enlightenment, one representing the ideal of a paladin and the other of a monk, so to speak. One more aggressive, of labor, and the other one more passive, of contemplation.
Comments?
