Difference between revisions of "File talk:Woman-phallus.gif"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→More porn: he stated it was gay porn himself) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::The only problem is no one would know that they would be offended by your comments until after they read them. Yes the content was chosen for its sexual content, that is what the religion is based on. While you have your right to state your opinion, this is a public community and isnt a place for a flamewar, you should not be accusing the user of adolescent homosexual fantasies. As my philosophy prof always says, "Your right to swing your fist stops where my face begins."--[[User:Aralaiquendi|Aralaiquendi]] 17:56, 25 December 2006 (CET) | :::::The only problem is no one would know that they would be offended by your comments until after they read them. Yes the content was chosen for its sexual content, that is what the religion is based on. While you have your right to state your opinion, this is a public community and isnt a place for a flamewar, you should not be accusing the user of adolescent homosexual fantasies. As my philosophy prof always says, "Your right to swing your fist stops where my face begins."--[[User:Aralaiquendi|Aralaiquendi]] 17:56, 25 December 2006 (CET) | ||
::::::Actually, his desire to express himself via typing up adolescent sexual fantasies was explicitly stated in his "''Doc-umentaries''". See the discussion at [[Talk:Avamar/Doc-umentaries/Porn/Act 1]]. If my statement was conjecture, you would be correct, but since he already posted what he admitted were gay porn stories, I am not posting mere conjecture. Paris wrote ''It is not gay porn ('''although till Act 3 it is''' and maybe most of it) but nor all of the Acts have been written yet.'' ('''bolding for emphasis''') --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 18:07, 25 December 2006 (CET) | ::::::Actually, his desire to express himself via typing up adolescent sexual fantasies was explicitly stated in his "''Doc-umentaries''". See the discussion at [[Talk:Avamar/Doc-umentaries/Porn/Act 1]]. If my statement was conjecture, you would be correct, but since he already posted what he admitted were gay porn stories, I am not posting mere conjecture. Paris wrote ''It is not gay porn ('''although till Act 3 it is''' and maybe most of it) but nor all of the Acts have been written yet.'' ('''bolding for emphasis''') --[[User:Habap|Habap]] 18:07, 25 December 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | :::::::I think you'll find you've confused two different users. [[User:Bare Truth|Bare Truth]] uploaded this image not Paris - this has nothing to do with him. - [[User:Revan|Revan]] 20:34, 25 December 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 25 December 2006
More porn
I grow weary of this consistent insertion of pornography. If you have homosexual fantasies, please keep them to the appropriate websites for such private issues. --Habap 14:52, 24 December 2006 (CET)
- I would hardly name art from the antiquities as pornography - Revan 16:14, 24 December 2006 (CET)
- The user has chosen it and many other objects for their sexual content, not their artistic value. If it were chosen for artistic or historical value, I would agree with you, but it is apparent from his contributions and uploads that his intent involves adolescent sexual fantasies, not artistic enrichment. --Habap 19:20, 24 December 2006 (CET)
- And Tom has said he doesn't mind a few bare breasts(see Talk:Gymnistism). His comment about pubic areas implies that he doesn't mind them either. No one is forcing you to look at the images. You're free to ignore them. The relevant pages have warnings about the nature of the images. What more do you want? - LilWolf 20:33, 24 December 2006 (CET)
- Yes, Tom doesn't mind. I find it juvenile and was exercising my own right to free speech by letting the uploader know my opinion. You don't have to read my comments if they offend you either. --Habap 00:48, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- The only problem is no one would know that they would be offended by your comments until after they read them. Yes the content was chosen for its sexual content, that is what the religion is based on. While you have your right to state your opinion, this is a public community and isnt a place for a flamewar, you should not be accusing the user of adolescent homosexual fantasies. As my philosophy prof always says, "Your right to swing your fist stops where my face begins."--Aralaiquendi 17:56, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- Actually, his desire to express himself via typing up adolescent sexual fantasies was explicitly stated in his "Doc-umentaries". See the discussion at Talk:Avamar/Doc-umentaries/Porn/Act 1. If my statement was conjecture, you would be correct, but since he already posted what he admitted were gay porn stories, I am not posting mere conjecture. Paris wrote It is not gay porn (although till Act 3 it is and maybe most of it) but nor all of the Acts have been written yet. (bolding for emphasis) --Habap 18:07, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- I think you'll find you've confused two different users. Bare Truth uploaded this image not Paris - this has nothing to do with him. - Revan 20:34, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- Actually, his desire to express himself via typing up adolescent sexual fantasies was explicitly stated in his "Doc-umentaries". See the discussion at Talk:Avamar/Doc-umentaries/Porn/Act 1. If my statement was conjecture, you would be correct, but since he already posted what he admitted were gay porn stories, I am not posting mere conjecture. Paris wrote It is not gay porn (although till Act 3 it is and maybe most of it) but nor all of the Acts have been written yet. (bolding for emphasis) --Habap 18:07, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- The only problem is no one would know that they would be offended by your comments until after they read them. Yes the content was chosen for its sexual content, that is what the religion is based on. While you have your right to state your opinion, this is a public community and isnt a place for a flamewar, you should not be accusing the user of adolescent homosexual fantasies. As my philosophy prof always says, "Your right to swing your fist stops where my face begins."--Aralaiquendi 17:56, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- Yes, Tom doesn't mind. I find it juvenile and was exercising my own right to free speech by letting the uploader know my opinion. You don't have to read my comments if they offend you either. --Habap 00:48, 25 December 2006 (CET)
- And Tom has said he doesn't mind a few bare breasts(see Talk:Gymnistism). His comment about pubic areas implies that he doesn't mind them either. No one is forcing you to look at the images. You're free to ignore them. The relevant pages have warnings about the nature of the images. What more do you want? - LilWolf 20:33, 24 December 2006 (CET)
- The user has chosen it and many other objects for their sexual content, not their artistic value. If it were chosen for artistic or historical value, I would agree with you, but it is apparent from his contributions and uploads that his intent involves adolescent sexual fantasies, not artistic enrichment. --Habap 19:20, 24 December 2006 (CET)
