Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Classes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DorianGray (talk | contribs) m (categories - move to category discussion if necessary.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Same here, this should not be a category, it should be a single page where all the classes and their differences are discussed. Especially if you look for differences, it is important to have things on ''one'' page. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 20 July 2005 14:52 (CEST) | Same here, this should not be a category, it should be a single page where all the classes and their differences are discussed. Especially if you look for differences, it is important to have things on ''one'' page. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 20 July 2005 14:52 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I still disagree with this approach to categories. The way I thought of it, a category was like the main heading in a table of contents, where all of it fits in but specialised pages still deal with it, even if one section and the overall section is named the same. [[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22 July 2005 12:30 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:30, 22 July 2005
Same here, this should not be a category, it should be a single page where all the classes and their differences are discussed. Especially if you look for differences, it is important to have things on one page. --Tom 20 July 2005 14:52 (CEST)
- I still disagree with this approach to categories. The way I thought of it, a category was like the main heading in a table of contents, where all of it fits in but specialised pages still deal with it, even if one section and the overall section is named the same. DorianGray 22 July 2005 12:30 (CEST)
