Difference between revisions of "Talk:Semantic Wiki/Templates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→simplify, please: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That is something I have to look at. I stopped looking at the parser functions when I realized how many of them weren't supported under the old wiki. I have to go back and look at them again, and maybe rethink some of the RB templates to account for the specific positions. The RB stuff was designed to be more generic. Under the new semantic stuff, we'll need some specifics. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 13:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | :That is something I have to look at. I stopped looking at the parser functions when I realized how many of them weren't supported under the old wiki. I have to go back and look at them again, and maybe rethink some of the RB templates to account for the specific positions. The RB stuff was designed to be more generic. Under the new semantic stuff, we'll need some specifics. --[[User:Indirik|Indirik]] 13:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Not a problem. We already ''have'' specifics - the game details the specifics of a realm or region. There are some additionals and some that people might simply want to leave out, but a rough outline is there right from the game. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 13:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Not a problem. We already ''have'' specifics - the game details the specifics of a realm or region. There are some additionals and some that people might simply want to leave out, but a rough outline is there right from the game. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 13:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == simplify, please == | ||
| + | |||
| + | RealmBox is way too complicated. Please, let us create a simple system. It doesn't have to be 500% configurable. On the contrary, we should think more of the readers and less of the editors - consistency is a good thing. --[[User:Tom|Tom]] 18:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 6 February 2009
We should use ParserFunctions on these templates, if we don't already. That way, items that are not specified will not be just empty, but the entire row can be omitted, for example. --Tom 13:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- That is something I have to look at. I stopped looking at the parser functions when I realized how many of them weren't supported under the old wiki. I have to go back and look at them again, and maybe rethink some of the RB templates to account for the specific positions. The RB stuff was designed to be more generic. Under the new semantic stuff, we'll need some specifics. --Indirik 13:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Not a problem. We already have specifics - the game details the specifics of a realm or region. There are some additionals and some that people might simply want to leave out, but a rough outline is there right from the game. --Tom 13:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
simplify, please
RealmBox is way too complicated. Please, let us create a simple system. It doesn't have to be 500% configurable. On the contrary, we should think more of the readers and less of the editors - consistency is a good thing. --Tom 18:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
