Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tara Times"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(editorial area added) |
(comment) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. [[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET) | It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. [[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| − | Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET) | + | :Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET) |
| − | + | ::At least you're calling it an editorial Rojo. Whereas, ''RedSpan Revealer'' and ''Abington First'' report under the guise of news. -[[User:Jezralhm|Jezralhm]] 11:40, 1 February 2007 (CET) | |
| + | |||
| + | ''The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--[[User:Rojo|Rojo]] 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)'' | ||
== Editorials == | == Editorials == | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 1 February 2007
Is this actually going to have news on it? Why create a page without any content? AlexTurner 4 October 2005 23:02 (CEST)
Refreshing
It's nice to see other newspapers devout to truth and not spreading their opinions. Jezralhm 05:56, 29 January 2007 (CET)
- Thank you for the compliment. We may add an editorial soon though so it may not be unbiased for long. --Rojo 02:50, 1 February 2007 (CET)
- At least you're calling it an editorial Rojo. Whereas, RedSpan Revealer and Abington First report under the guise of news. -Jezralhm 11:40, 1 February 2007 (CET)
The editorial section below is for newspaper staff only. If you wish to respond to an editorial make a new sub heading. Thank you.--Rojo 04:36, 1 February 2007 (CET)
