Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fronen/January 07 Rebellion/Summary"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* "Rebel JeanOlivier Chenier calls for a new rebellion. Nobody joins him." That's not a nice way to say it... ;) Oh, right, I'll want to save those last RPs from him somewhere... -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 13:59, 18 January 2007 (CET) | * "Rebel JeanOlivier Chenier calls for a new rebellion. Nobody joins him." That's not a nice way to say it... ;) Oh, right, I'll want to save those last RPs from him somewhere... -[[User:Chénier|Chénier]] 13:59, 18 January 2007 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No Hiereshmont, did you listen to me? I said it probably is biased but it isn't meant to be. ie While it might be biased, it isn't done intentionally. That is all I am saying. I am NOT saying it isn't biased. --[[User:Alex|Alex]] 21:17, 19 January 2007 (CET) (Character: Alexius) | ||
Revision as of 22:17, 19 January 2007
Question: Is this supposed to be an unbiased summary, or not? I'm just trying to figure out which it's supposed to be. Vellos 05:53, 17 January 2007 (CET)
It is meant to be a summary nothing more nothing less. This was written by Loyalists not specifically trying to be neutral so I suppose it is somewhat biased. Is it MEANT to be, no. Is it, probably. --Alex 06:39, 17 January 2007 (CET) (Character:Alexius)
You call that unbiased? hmmm... okay. I suppose I run an impartial newspaper then! Vellos 13:45, 17 January 2007 (CET)
- "Rebel JeanOlivier Chenier calls for a new rebellion. Nobody joins him." That's not a nice way to say it... ;) Oh, right, I'll want to save those last RPs from him somewhere... -Chénier 13:59, 18 January 2007 (CET)
No Hiereshmont, did you listen to me? I said it probably is biased but it isn't meant to be. ie While it might be biased, it isn't done intentionally. That is all I am saying. I am NOT saying it isn't biased. --Alex 21:17, 19 January 2007 (CET) (Character: Alexius)
